From b2d80610db6beda38573890ed169815e495bc663 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nguyễn Gia Phong Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 16:34:31 +0700 Subject: [usth/ICT2.7] Engineer software --- ...hoosing a Model Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) create mode 100644 usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/20 - Choosing a Model Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt (limited to 'usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/20 - Choosing a Model Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt') diff --git a/usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/20 - Choosing a Model Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt b/usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/20 - Choosing a Model Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7ea0e4f --- /dev/null +++ b/usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/20 - Choosing a Model Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +1 +00:00:00,150 --> 00:00:02,860 +In this case, I think about the spiral model, + +2 +00:00:02,860 --> 00:00:06,610 +and evolutionary prototyping model will work. Definitely you don't want to + +3 +00:00:06,610 --> 00:00:09,110 +have a pure water from water. Why? Well because it + +4 +00:00:09,110 --> 00:00:11,940 +is very expensive with a pure waterfall model to make + +5 +00:00:11,940 --> 00:00:15,460 +changes during the course of the project, especially changes + +6 +00:00:15,460 --> 00:00:17,860 +that involve requirements. Why? Because we saw that it can + +7 +00:00:17,860 --> 00:00:20,440 +be very expensive. Whereas with the spiral model, we saw + +8 +00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:25,220 +that being iterative, we can actually make correction throughout development. + +9 +00:00:25,220 --> 00:00:28,840 +Similarly, with evolutionary prototyping, we keep evolving our system + +10 +00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:32,170 +based on the customer feedback. And therefore, if something changes, + +11 +00:00:32,170 --> 00:00:33,810 +we will get feedback right away, and we will + +12 +00:00:33,810 --> 00:00:36,230 +be able to adapt. So the key thing here is + +13 +00:00:36,230 --> 00:00:39,060 +that anything that is iterative works better in the + +14 +00:00:39,060 --> 00:00:43,400 +case of changing environments. So, situations in which your requirements, + +15 +00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:46,720 +the situation, the project might change. Whereas waterfall is + +16 +00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:50,410 +more appropriate for situations in which the requirements are stable, + +17 +00:00:50,410 --> 00:00:53,760 +we know the domain, and possibly we also know the technologies involved. -- cgit 1.4.1