diff options
author | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2013-09-07 15:51:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2013-09-07 15:51:29 +0200 |
commit | 2df74ac1175225b1e3080acb3e7ea61ad16424f6 (patch) | |
tree | 8f140cf0eb838bbf0b2de2c13057f4b72a093317 | |
parent | a129e0d877f125693f58457d55973d184468b461 (diff) | |
download | guix-2df74ac1175225b1e3080acb3e7ea61ad16424f6.tar.gz |
doc: Add "Data Types and Pattern Matching" to the Coding Style.
* HACKING (Data Types and Pattern Matching): New section.
-rw-r--r-- | HACKING | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING index 85e9a900be..ef8fb27cbe 100644 --- a/HACKING +++ b/HACKING @@ -108,6 +108,18 @@ However, it is OK for a “host-side” module to use a build-side module. Modules that deal with the broader GNU system should be in the (gnu …) name space rather than (guix …). +** Data Types and Pattern Matching + +The tendency in classical Lisp is to use lists to represent everything, and +then to browse them “by hand” using ‘car’, ‘cdr’, ‘cadr’, and co. There are +several problems with that style, notably the fact that it is hard to read, +error-prone, and a hindrance to proper type error reports. + +Guix code should define appropriate data types (for instance, using +‘define-record-type*’) rather than abuse lists. In addition, it should use +pattern matching, via Guile’s (ice-9 match) module, especially when matching +lists. + ** Formatting Code When writing Scheme code, we follow common wisdom among Scheme programmers. |