gnu: musl: Update to 1.1.17.

* gnu/packages/musl.scm (musl): Update to 1.1.17.
[source]: Remove patch.
* gnu/packages/patches/musl-CVE-2016-8859.patch: Delete file.
* gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 81 deletions

diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/musl-CVE-2016-8859.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/musl-CVE-2016-8859.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 7bb5b892dd..0000000000
--- a/gnu/packages/patches/musl-CVE-2016-8859.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,81 +0,0 @@
-Fix CVE-2016-8859:
-
-https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-8859
-
-Patch copied from upstream source repository:
-
-http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=c3edc06d1e1360f3570db9155d6b318ae0d0f0f7
-
-From c3edc06d1e1360f3570db9155d6b318ae0d0f0f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:34:58 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH] fix missing integer overflow checks in regexec buffer size
- computations
-
-most of the possible overflows were already ruled out in practice by
-regcomp having already succeeded performing larger allocations.
-however at least the num_states*num_tags multiplication can clearly
-overflow in practice. for safety, check them all, and use the proper
-type, size_t, rather than int.
-
-also improve comments, use calloc in place of malloc+memset, and
-remove bogus casts.
----
- src/regex/regexec.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/src/regex/regexec.c b/src/regex/regexec.c
-index 16c5d0a..dd52319 100644
---- a/src/regex/regexec.c
-+++ b/src/regex/regexec.c
-@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
- #include <wchar.h>
- #include <wctype.h>
- #include <limits.h>
-+#include <stdint.h>
- 
- #include <regex.h>
- 
-@@ -206,11 +207,24 @@ tre_tnfa_run_parallel(const tre_tnfa_t *tnfa, const void *string,
- 
-   /* Allocate memory for temporary data required for matching.	This needs to
-      be done for every matching operation to be thread safe.  This allocates
--     everything in a single large block from the stack frame using alloca()
--     or with malloc() if alloca is unavailable. */
-+     everything in a single large block with calloc(). */
-   {
--    int tbytes, rbytes, pbytes, xbytes, total_bytes;
-+    size_t tbytes, rbytes, pbytes, xbytes, total_bytes;
-     char *tmp_buf;
-+
-+    /* Ensure that tbytes and xbytes*num_states cannot overflow, and that
-+     * they don't contribute more than 1/8 of SIZE_MAX to total_bytes. */
-+    if (num_tags > SIZE_MAX/(8 * sizeof(int) * tnfa->num_states))
-+      goto error_exit;
-+
-+    /* Likewise check rbytes. */
-+    if (tnfa->num_states+1 > SIZE_MAX/(8 * sizeof(*reach_next)))
-+      goto error_exit;
-+
-+    /* Likewise check pbytes. */
-+    if (tnfa->num_states > SIZE_MAX/(8 * sizeof(*reach_pos)))
-+      goto error_exit;
-+
-     /* Compute the length of the block we need. */
-     tbytes = sizeof(*tmp_tags) * num_tags;
-     rbytes = sizeof(*reach_next) * (tnfa->num_states + 1);
-@@ -221,10 +235,9 @@ tre_tnfa_run_parallel(const tre_tnfa_t *tnfa, const void *string,
-       + (rbytes + xbytes * tnfa->num_states) * 2 + tbytes + pbytes;
- 
-     /* Allocate the memory. */
--    buf = xmalloc((unsigned)total_bytes);
-+    buf = calloc(total_bytes, 1);
-     if (buf == NULL)
-       return REG_ESPACE;
--    memset(buf, 0, (size_t)total_bytes);
- 
-     /* Get the various pointers within tmp_buf (properly aligned). */
-     tmp_tags = (void *)buf;
--- 
-2.10.1
-