diff options
author | Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> | 2019-03-29 15:59:51 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | 宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org> | 2019-04-07 14:10:04 +0800 |
commit | e7dcdd9feacf3314d040739ceb250d4a26894ee0 (patch) | |
tree | b983254ac76c6e392ca42229619c0e186ea048ac /gnu/packages | |
parent | 135984ef153ea757ab06be34531d49839b6c692f (diff) | |
download | guix-e7dcdd9feacf3314d040739ceb250d4a26894ee0.tar.gz |
gnu: Add checkl.
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl-checkl, cl-checkl): New variables. Signed-off-by: 宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/packages')
-rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 38 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm index 99eb9cb830..91ee3d3428 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm @@ -4616,3 +4616,41 @@ Only minimal changes required to make your CLOS objects serializable.") (define-public cl-marshal (sbcl-package->cl-source-package sbcl-marshal)) + +(define-public sbcl-checkl + (let ((commit "80328800d047fef9b6e32dfe6bdc98396aee3cc9") + (revision "1")) + (package + (name "sbcl-checkl") + (version (git-version "0.0.0" revision commit)) + (source + (origin + (method git-fetch) + (uri (git-reference + (url "https://github.com/rpav/CheckL.git") + (commit commit))) + (file-name (git-file-name name version)) + (sha256 + (base32 "0bpisihx1gay44xmyr1dmhlwh00j0zzi04rp9fy35i95l2r4xdlx")))) + (build-system asdf-build-system/sbcl) + (arguments + ;; Error while trying to load definition for system checkl-test from + ;; pathname [...]/checkl-test.asd: The function CHECKL:DEFINE-TEST-OP + ;; is undefined. + '(#:tests? #f)) + (native-inputs + `(("sbcl-fiveam" ,sbcl-fiveam))) + (inputs + `(("sbcl-marshal" ,sbcl-marshal))) + (home-page "https://github.com/rpav/CheckL/") + (synopsis "Dynamic testing for Common Lisp") + (description + "CheckL lets you write tests dynamically, it checks resulting values +against the last run.") + ;; The author specifies both LLGPL and "BSD", but the "BSD" license + ;; isn't specified anywhere, so I don't know which kind. LLGPL is the + ;; stronger of the two and so I think only listing this should suffice. + (license license:llgpl)))) + +(define-public cl-checkl + (sbcl-package->cl-source-package sbcl-checkl)) |