diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/packages/patches')
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-cut-huge-range-test.patch | 29 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-fix-cross-compilation.patch | 15 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/findutils-gnulib-multi-core.patch | 294 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8105.patch | 56 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8287.patch | 44 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/gettext-gnulib-multi-core.patch | 178 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/gettext-multi-core.patch | 185 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/grep-gnulib-lock.patch | 32 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/libffi-3.2.1-complex-alpha.patch | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/libunistring-gnulib-multi-core.patch | 178 |
10 files changed, 915 insertions, 124 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-cut-huge-range-test.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-cut-huge-range-test.patch index 0be2cef2b8..e3a0ef28eb 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-cut-huge-range-test.patch +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-cut-huge-range-test.patch @@ -1,22 +1,33 @@ This patch fixes 100% reproducible test failures on arm-linux-gnueabihf in our -the build environment chroot, as reported at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26253>. -It is a followup to this upstream patch: +the build environment chroot, as reported at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26253>, +and now on x86_64-linux-gnu as well. It is a variant of this upstream patch: - commit 28803c8a3144d5d4363cdbd148bbe067af1a67c2 - Author: Pádraig Brady <P@draigBrady.com> - Date: Fri Mar 3 00:25:54 2017 -0800 + commit f5422009389678680dba9ff4ecb7d33632ee3383 + Author: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> + Date: Mon Mar 27 20:34:39 2017 -0700 - tests: avoid a spurious failure on older debian + tests: avoid false ulimit failure on some systems + + * tests/misc/cut-huge-range.sh: On some systems returns_ may + use more memory, so incorporate that in the determination + of the ulimit value to use. Noticed on ARMv7 with bash-4.4.12, + and x86_64 with bash-4.2.37. + Fixes http://bugs.gnu.org/26253 ... which appeared to be insufficient. +diff --git a/tests/misc/cut-huge-range.sh b/tests/misc/cut-huge-range.sh +index 6b3c5b6ed..55b7b640e 100755 --- a/tests/misc/cut-huge-range.sh +++ b/tests/misc/cut-huge-range.sh -@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ getlimits_ +@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ + print_ver_ cut + getlimits_ - vm=$(get_min_ulimit_v_ cut -b1 /dev/null) \ +-vm=$(get_min_ulimit_v_ cut -b1 /dev/null) \ ++vm=$(get_min_ulimit_v_ sh -c 'cut -b1 /dev/null') \ || skip_ "this shell lacks ulimit support" -+vm=$(($vm + $(getconf PAGESIZE))) # avoid spurious failures + vm=$(($vm + 1000)) # avoid spurious failures # sed script to subtract one from the input. # Each input line should consist of a positive decimal number. diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-fix-cross-compilation.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-fix-cross-compilation.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 3f0d35c33e..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/coreutils-fix-cross-compilation.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ -Coreutils fails to cross compile for other platforms because cu_install_program -is not being evaluated properly. This patch fixes it. -See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2017-01/msg00039.html> ---- a/Makefile.in -+++ b/Makefile.in -@@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ pr = progs-readme - @CROSS_COMPILING_FALSE@cu_install_program = src/ginstall - - # Use the just-built 'ginstall', when not cross-compiling. --@CROSS_COMPILING_TRUE@cu_install_program = @INSTALL_PROGRAM@ -+@CROSS_COMPILING_TRUE@cu_install_program := @INSTALL@ - info_TEXINFOS = doc/coreutils.texi - doc_coreutils_TEXINFOS = \ - doc/perm.texi \ - diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/findutils-gnulib-multi-core.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/findutils-gnulib-multi-core.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5a37f4f1f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/findutils-gnulib-multi-core.patch @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@ +This patch fixes performance problems on multi-core machines +as reported at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26441>. + +See commit 480d374e596a0ee3fed168ab42cd84c313ad3c89 in Gnulib +by Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>. + +diff --git a/tests/test-lock.c b/tests/test-lock.c +index a992f64..fb18dee 100644 +--- a/tests/test-lock.c ++++ b/tests/test-lock.c +@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ + /* Test of locking in multithreaded situations. +- Copyright (C) 2005, 2008-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ++ Copyright (C) 2005, 2008-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + + This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +@@ -50,6 +50,28 @@ + Uncomment this to see if the operating system has a fair scheduler. */ + #define EXPLICIT_YIELD 1 + ++/* Whether to use 'volatile' on some variables that communicate information ++ between threads. If set to 0, a semaphore or a lock is used to protect ++ these variables. If set to 1, 'volatile' is used; this is theoretically ++ equivalent but can lead to much slower execution (e.g. 30x slower total ++ run time on a 40-core machine), because 'volatile' does not imply any ++ synchronization/communication between different CPUs. */ ++#define USE_VOLATILE 0 ++ ++#if USE_POSIX_THREADS && HAVE_SEMAPHORE_H ++/* Whether to use a semaphore to communicate information between threads. ++ If set to 0, a lock is used. If set to 1, a semaphore is used. ++ Uncomment this to reduce the dependencies of this test. */ ++# define USE_SEMAPHORE 1 ++/* Mac OS X provides only named semaphores (sem_open); its facility for ++ unnamed semaphores (sem_init) does not work. */ ++# if defined __APPLE__ && defined __MACH__ ++# define USE_NAMED_SEMAPHORE 1 ++# else ++# define USE_UNNAMED_SEMAPHORE 1 ++# endif ++#endif ++ + /* Whether to print debugging messages. */ + #define ENABLE_DEBUGGING 0 + +@@ -90,6 +112,12 @@ + + #include "glthread/thread.h" + #include "glthread/yield.h" ++#if USE_SEMAPHORE ++# include <errno.h> ++# include <fcntl.h> ++# include <semaphore.h> ++# include <unistd.h> ++#endif + + #if ENABLE_DEBUGGING + # define dbgprintf printf +@@ -103,6 +131,132 @@ + # define yield() + #endif + ++#if USE_VOLATILE ++struct atomic_int { ++ volatile int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ return ai->value; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ ai->value = new_value; ++} ++#elif USE_SEMAPHORE ++/* This atomic_int implementation can only support the values 0 and 1. ++ It is initially 0 and can be set to 1 only once. */ ++# if USE_UNNAMED_SEMAPHORE ++struct atomic_int { ++ sem_t semaphore; ++}; ++#define atomic_int_semaphore(ai) (&(ai)->semaphore) ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ sem_init (&ai->semaphore, 0, 0); ++} ++# endif ++# if USE_NAMED_SEMAPHORE ++struct atomic_int { ++ sem_t *semaphore; ++}; ++#define atomic_int_semaphore(ai) ((ai)->semaphore) ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ sem_t *s; ++ unsigned int count; ++ for (count = 0; ; count++) ++ { ++ char name[80]; ++ /* Use getpid() in the name, so that different processes running at the ++ same time will not interfere. Use ai in the name, so that different ++ atomic_int in the same process will not interfere. Use a count in ++ the name, so that even in the (unlikely) case that a semaphore with ++ the specified name already exists, we can try a different name. */ ++ sprintf (name, "test-lock-%lu-%p-%u", ++ (unsigned long) getpid (), ai, count); ++ s = sem_open (name, O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0600, 0); ++ if (s == SEM_FAILED) ++ { ++ if (errno == EEXIST) ++ /* Retry with a different name. */ ++ continue; ++ else ++ { ++ perror ("sem_open failed"); ++ abort (); ++ } ++ } ++ else ++ { ++ /* Try not to leave a semaphore hanging around on the file system ++ eternally, if we can avoid it. */ ++ sem_unlink (name); ++ break; ++ } ++ } ++ ai->semaphore = s; ++} ++# endif ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ if (sem_trywait (atomic_int_semaphore (ai)) == 0) ++ { ++ if (sem_post (atomic_int_semaphore (ai))) ++ abort (); ++ return 1; ++ } ++ else if (errno == EAGAIN) ++ return 0; ++ else ++ abort (); ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ if (new_value == 0) ++ /* It's already initialized with 0. */ ++ return; ++ /* To set the value 1: */ ++ if (sem_post (atomic_int_semaphore (ai))) ++ abort (); ++} ++#else ++struct atomic_int { ++ gl_lock_define (, lock) ++ int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_init (ai->lock); ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ int ret = ai->value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++ return ret; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ ai->value = new_value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++} ++#endif ++ + #define ACCOUNT_COUNT 4 + + static int account[ACCOUNT_COUNT]; +@@ -170,12 +324,12 @@ lock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int lock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int lock_checker_done; + + static void * + lock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!lock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_lock_lock (my_lock); +@@ -200,7 +354,8 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- lock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&lock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (lock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -210,7 +365,7 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- lock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } +@@ -254,12 +409,12 @@ rwlock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int rwlock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int rwlock_checker_done; + + static void * + rwlock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!rwlock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check rdlock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_rwlock_rdlock (my_rwlock); +@@ -284,7 +439,8 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- rwlock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&rwlock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) +@@ -295,7 +451,7 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- rwlock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 1); + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (checkerthreads[i], NULL); + check_accounts (); +@@ -356,12 +512,12 @@ reclock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int reclock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int reclock_checker_done; + + static void * + reclock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!reclock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_recursive_lock_lock (my_reclock); +@@ -386,7 +542,8 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- reclock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&reclock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (reclock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -396,7 +553,7 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- reclock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8105.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8105.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 1891c4ab5f..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8105.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,56 +0,0 @@ -Fix CVE-2017-8105: - -https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-8105 -https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=935 - -Patch copied from upstream source repository: - -https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=f958c48ee431bef8d4d466b40c9cb2d4dbcb7791 - -From f958c48ee431bef8d4d466b40c9cb2d4dbcb7791 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Werner Lemberg <wl@gnu.org> -Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:15:10 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] [psaux] Better protect `flex' handling. - -Reported as - - https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=935 - -* src/psaux/t1decode.c (t1_decoder_parse_charstrings) -<callothersubr>: Since there is not a single flex operator but a -series of subroutine calls, malformed fonts can call arbitrary other -operators after the start of a flex, possibly adding points. For -this reason we have to check the available number of points before -inserting a point. ---- - ChangeLog | 15 +++++++++++++++ - src/psaux/t1decode.c | 9 +++++++++ - 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/psaux/t1decode.c b/src/psaux/t1decode.c -index af7b465e..7dd45135 100644 ---- a/src/psaux/t1decode.c -+++ b/src/psaux/t1decode.c -@@ -780,10 +780,19 @@ - /* point without adding any point to the outline */ - idx = decoder->num_flex_vectors++; - if ( idx > 0 && idx < 7 ) -+ { -+ /* in malformed fonts it is possible to have other */ -+ /* opcodes in the middle of a flex (which don't */ -+ /* increase `num_flex_vectors'); we thus have to */ -+ /* check whether we can add a point */ -+ if ( FT_SET_ERROR( t1_builder_check_points( builder, 1 ) ) ) -+ goto Syntax_Error; -+ - t1_builder_add_point( builder, - x, - y, - (FT_Byte)( idx == 3 || idx == 6 ) ); -+ } - } - break; - --- -2.12.2 - diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8287.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8287.patch deleted file mode 100644 index d1145a87ee..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/freetype-CVE-2017-8287.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,44 +0,0 @@ -Fix CVE-2017-8287: - -https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-8287 -https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=941 - -Patch copied from upstream source repository: -https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=3774fc08b502c3e685afca098b6e8a195aded6a0 - -From 3774fc08b502c3e685afca098b6e8a195aded6a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Werner Lemberg <wl@gnu.org> -Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 08:32:09 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH] * src/psaux/psobjs.c (t1_builder_close_contour): Add safety - guard. - -Reported as - - https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=941 ---- - ChangeLog | 8 ++++++++ - src/psaux/psobjs.c | 8 ++++++++ - 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/psaux/psobjs.c b/src/psaux/psobjs.c -index d18e821a..0baf8368 100644 ---- a/src/psaux/psobjs.c -+++ b/src/psaux/psobjs.c -@@ -1718,6 +1718,14 @@ - first = outline->n_contours <= 1 - ? 0 : outline->contours[outline->n_contours - 2] + 1; - -+ /* in malformed fonts it can happen that a contour was started */ -+ /* but no points were added */ -+ if ( outline->n_contours && first == outline->n_points ) -+ { -+ outline->n_contours--; -+ return; -+ } -+ - /* We must not include the last point in the path if it */ - /* is located on the first point. */ - if ( outline->n_points > 1 ) --- -2.12.2 - diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/gettext-gnulib-multi-core.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/gettext-gnulib-multi-core.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5ccdbe4ca1 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/gettext-gnulib-multi-core.patch @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ +This patch fixes performance problems on multi-core machines +as reported at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26441>. + +See commit 480d374e596a0ee3fed168ab42cd84c313ad3c89 in Gnulib +by Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>. + +diff --git a/gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/test-lock.c b/gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/test-lock.c +index cb734b4e6..aa6de2739 100644 +--- a/gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/test-lock.c ++++ b/gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/test-lock.c +@@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ + Uncomment this to see if the operating system has a fair scheduler. */ + #define EXPLICIT_YIELD 1 + ++/* Whether to use 'volatile' on some variables that communicate information ++ between threads. If set to 0, a lock is used to protect these variables. ++ If set to 1, 'volatile' is used; this is theoretically equivalent but can ++ lead to much slower execution (e.g. 30x slower total run time on a 40-core ++ machine. */ ++#define USE_VOLATILE 0 ++ + /* Whether to print debugging messages. */ + #define ENABLE_DEBUGGING 0 + +@@ -103,6 +110,51 @@ + # define yield() + #endif + ++#if USE_VOLATILE ++struct atomic_int { ++ volatile int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ return ai->value; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ ai->value = new_value; ++} ++#else ++struct atomic_int { ++ gl_lock_define (, lock) ++ int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_init (ai->lock); ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ int ret = ai->value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++ return ret; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ ai->value = new_value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++} ++#endif ++ + #define ACCOUNT_COUNT 4 + + static int account[ACCOUNT_COUNT]; +@@ -170,12 +222,12 @@ lock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int lock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int lock_checker_done; + + static void * + lock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!lock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_lock_lock (my_lock); +@@ -200,7 +252,8 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- lock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&lock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (lock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -210,7 +263,7 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- lock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } +@@ -254,12 +307,12 @@ rwlock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int rwlock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int rwlock_checker_done; + + static void * + rwlock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!rwlock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check rdlock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_rwlock_rdlock (my_rwlock); +@@ -284,7 +337,8 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- rwlock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&rwlock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) +@@ -295,7 +349,7 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- rwlock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 1); + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (checkerthreads[i], NULL); + check_accounts (); +@@ -356,12 +410,12 @@ reclock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int reclock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int reclock_checker_done; + + static void * + reclock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!reclock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_recursive_lock_lock (my_reclock); +@@ -386,7 +440,8 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- reclock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&reclock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (reclock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -396,7 +451,7 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- reclock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/gettext-multi-core.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/gettext-multi-core.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..31a378cfd0 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/gettext-multi-core.patch @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +This patch fixes performance problems on multi-core machines +as reported at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26441>. + +See commit 1afbcb06fded2a427b761dd1615b1e48e1e853cc in Gettext +by Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>. + +diff --git a/gettext-runtime/tests/test-lock.c b/gettext-runtime/tests/test-lock.c +index d279d1d60..51cec3d6b 100644 +--- a/gettext-runtime/tests/test-lock.c ++++ b/gettext-runtime/tests/test-lock.c +@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ + /* Test of locking in multithreaded situations. +- Copyright (C) 2005, 2008-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ++ Copyright (C) 2005, 2008-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + + This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by +@@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ + Uncomment this to see if the operating system has a fair scheduler. */ + #define EXPLICIT_YIELD 1 + ++/* Whether to use 'volatile' on some variables that communicate information ++ between threads. If set to 0, a lock is used to protect these variables. ++ If set to 1, 'volatile' is used; this is theoretically equivalent but can ++ lead to much slower execution (e.g. 30x slower total run time on a 40-core ++ machine. */ ++#define USE_VOLATILE 0 ++ + /* Whether to print debugging messages. */ + #define ENABLE_DEBUGGING 0 + +@@ -214,6 +221,51 @@ static inline void * gl_thread_self_pointer (void) + # define yield() + #endif + ++#if USE_VOLATILE ++struct atomic_int { ++ volatile int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ return ai->value; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ ai->value = new_value; ++} ++#else ++struct atomic_int { ++ gl_lock_define (, lock) ++ int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_init (ai->lock); ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ int ret = ai->value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++ return ret; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ ai->value = new_value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++} ++#endif ++ + #define ACCOUNT_COUNT 4 + + static int account[ACCOUNT_COUNT]; +@@ -281,12 +333,12 @@ lock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int lock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int lock_checker_done; + + static void * + lock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!lock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_lock_lock (my_lock); +@@ -311,7 +363,8 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- lock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&lock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (lock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -321,7 +374,7 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- lock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } +@@ -365,12 +418,12 @@ rwlock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int rwlock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int rwlock_checker_done; + + static void * + rwlock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!rwlock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check rdlock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_rwlock_rdlock (my_rwlock); +@@ -395,7 +448,8 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- rwlock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&rwlock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) +@@ -406,7 +460,7 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- rwlock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 1); + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (checkerthreads[i], NULL); + check_accounts (); +@@ -467,12 +521,12 @@ reclock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int reclock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int reclock_checker_done; + + static void * + reclock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!reclock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_recursive_lock_lock (my_reclock); +@@ -497,7 +551,8 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- reclock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&reclock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (reclock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -507,7 +562,7 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- reclock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/grep-gnulib-lock.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/grep-gnulib-lock.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..68c33f1031 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/grep-gnulib-lock.patch @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +This patch fix error on 'gnulib' library required to build +'grep' package on GNU/Hurd. +The patch was adapted from upstream source repository: +'<http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commit;h=4084b3a1094372b960ce4a97634e08f4538c8bdd>' + +Commit: 4084b3a1094372b960ce4a97634e08f4538c8bdd + +diff --git a/lib/glthread/lock.c b/lib/glthread/lock.c +index 061562b..afc86f4 100644 +--- a/lib/glthread/lock.c ++++ b/lib/glthread/lock.c +@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ + + /* ------------------------- gl_rwlock_t datatype ------------------------- */ + +-# if HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK && (HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER || (__GNU_LIBRARY__ > 1)) ++# if HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK && (HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER || (defined PTHREAD_RWLOCK_WRITER_NONRECURSIVE_INITIALIZER_NP && (__GNU_LIBRARY__ > 1))) + + # ifdef PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER + +diff --git a/lib/glthread/lock.h b/lib/glthread/lock.h +index ec16d39..67932aa 100644 +--- a/lib/glthread/lock.h ++++ b/lib/glthread/lock.h +@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ typedef pthread_mutex_t gl_lock_t; + + /* ------------------------- gl_rwlock_t datatype ------------------------- */ + +-# if HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK && (HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER || (__GNU_LIBRARY__ > 1)) ++# if HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK && (HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER || (defined PTHREAD_RWLOCK_WRITER_NONRECURSIVE_INITIALIZER_NP && (__GNU_LIBRARY__ > 1))) + + # ifdef PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/libffi-3.2.1-complex-alpha.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/libffi-3.2.1-complex-alpha.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ebbc0635a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/libffi-3.2.1-complex-alpha.patch @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +The patch fixes build failure of form: + ../src/alpha/osf.S:298:2: error: #error "osf.S out of sync with ffi.h" +Upstream fixed the bug in a more invasive way +but didn't have releases since 3.2.1. + +The patch is taken from Gentoo: +https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/dev-libs/libffi/files/libffi-3.2.1-complex_alpha.patch + +--- libffi-3.2.1/src/alpha/osf.S 2015-01-16 10:46:15.000000000 +0100 ++++ libffi-3.2.1/src/alpha/osf.S 2015-01-16 10:46:24.000000000 +0100 +@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ + .gprel32 $load_64 # FFI_TYPE_SINT64 + .gprel32 $load_none # FFI_TYPE_STRUCT + .gprel32 $load_64 # FFI_TYPE_POINTER ++ .gprel32 $load_none # FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX + + /* Assert that the table above is in sync with ffi.h. */ + +@@ -294,7 +295,8 @@ + || FFI_TYPE_SINT64 != 12 \ + || FFI_TYPE_STRUCT != 13 \ + || FFI_TYPE_POINTER != 14 \ +- || FFI_TYPE_LAST != 14 ++ || FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX != 15 \ ++ || FFI_TYPE_LAST != 15 + #error "osf.S out of sync with ffi.h" + #endif + diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/libunistring-gnulib-multi-core.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/libunistring-gnulib-multi-core.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..709b20c6d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/libunistring-gnulib-multi-core.patch @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ +This patch fixes performance problems on multi-core machines +as reported at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26441>. + +See commit 480d374e596a0ee3fed168ab42cd84c313ad3c89 in Gnulib +by Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>. + +diff --git a/tests/test-lock.c b/tests/test-lock.c +index cb734b4e6..aa6de2739 100644 +--- a/tests/test-lock.c ++++ b/tests/test-lock.c +@@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ + Uncomment this to see if the operating system has a fair scheduler. */ + #define EXPLICIT_YIELD 1 + ++/* Whether to use 'volatile' on some variables that communicate information ++ between threads. If set to 0, a lock is used to protect these variables. ++ If set to 1, 'volatile' is used; this is theoretically equivalent but can ++ lead to much slower execution (e.g. 30x slower total run time on a 40-core ++ machine. */ ++#define USE_VOLATILE 0 ++ + /* Whether to print debugging messages. */ + #define ENABLE_DEBUGGING 0 + +@@ -103,6 +110,51 @@ + # define yield() + #endif + ++#if USE_VOLATILE ++struct atomic_int { ++ volatile int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ return ai->value; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ ai->value = new_value; ++} ++#else ++struct atomic_int { ++ gl_lock_define (, lock) ++ int value; ++}; ++static void ++init_atomic_int (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_init (ai->lock); ++} ++static int ++get_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ int ret = ai->value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++ return ret; ++} ++static void ++set_atomic_int_value (struct atomic_int *ai, int new_value) ++{ ++ gl_lock_lock (ai->lock); ++ ai->value = new_value; ++ gl_lock_unlock (ai->lock); ++} ++#endif ++ + #define ACCOUNT_COUNT 4 + + static int account[ACCOUNT_COUNT]; +@@ -170,12 +222,12 @@ lock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int lock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int lock_checker_done; + + static void * + lock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!lock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_lock_lock (my_lock); +@@ -200,7 +252,8 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- lock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&lock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (lock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -210,7 +263,7 @@ test_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- lock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&lock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } +@@ -254,12 +307,12 @@ rwlock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int rwlock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int rwlock_checker_done; + + static void * + rwlock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!rwlock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check rdlock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_rwlock_rdlock (my_rwlock); +@@ -284,7 +337,8 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- rwlock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&rwlock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) +@@ -295,7 +349,7 @@ test_rwlock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- rwlock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&rwlock_checker_done, 1); + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (checkerthreads[i], NULL); + check_accounts (); +@@ -356,12 +410,12 @@ reclock_mutator_thread (void *arg) + return NULL; + } + +-static volatile int reclock_checker_done; ++static struct atomic_int reclock_checker_done; + + static void * + reclock_checker_thread (void *arg) + { +- while (!reclock_checker_done) ++ while (get_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done) == 0) + { + dbgprintf ("Checker %p before check lock\n", gl_thread_self_pointer ()); + gl_recursive_lock_lock (my_reclock); +@@ -386,7 +440,8 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Initialization. */ + for (i = 0; i < ACCOUNT_COUNT; i++) + account[i] = 1000; +- reclock_checker_done = 0; ++ init_atomic_int (&reclock_checker_done); ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 0); + + /* Spawn the threads. */ + checkerthread = gl_thread_create (reclock_checker_thread, NULL); +@@ -396,7 +451,7 @@ test_recursive_lock (void) + /* Wait for the threads to terminate. */ + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_COUNT; i++) + gl_thread_join (threads[i], NULL); +- reclock_checker_done = 1; ++ set_atomic_int_value (&reclock_checker_done, 1); + gl_thread_join (checkerthread, NULL); + check_accounts (); + } |