From be11b1024474489ead4d6befa40d38fd39fb9b72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ludovic Courtès Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:14:59 +0100 Subject: gnu: guile: Depend on 'libltdl' rather than 'libtool'. * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-1.8, guile-2.0): Replace LIBTOOL with LIBLTDL. --- gnu/packages/guile.scm | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm index 0796834369..0900768832 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/guile.scm @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ ;; Since `guile-1.8.pc' has "Libs: ... -lgmp -lltdl", these must be ;; propagated. (propagated-inputs `(("gmp" ,gmp) - ("libtool" ,libtool))) + ("libltdl" ,libltdl))) ;; When cross-compiling, a native version of Guile itself is needed. (self-native-input? #t) @@ -131,7 +131,10 @@ without requiring the source code to be rewritten.") ;; `-L' flags. As for why the `.la' file lacks the `-L' flags, see ;; . ("libunistring" ,libunistring) - ("libtool" ,libtool) + + ;; Depend on LIBLTDL, not LIBTOOL. That way, we avoid some the extra + ;; dependencies that LIBTOOL has, which is helpful during bootstrap. + ("libltdl" ,libltdl) ;; The headers and/or `guile-2.0.pc' refer to these packages, so they ;; must be propagated. -- cgit 1.4.1