From 3b7c606965656e95725e9cd5f1c7cfc4d0ea18cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:17:45 +0300
Subject: gnu: openjpeg: Fix CVE-2017-14151, CVE-2017-14152.
* gnu/packages/image.scm (openjpeg)[source]: Add patches.
* gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14151.patch,
gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14152.patch: New files.
* gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register them.
---
gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14151.patch | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14151.patch
(limited to 'gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14151.patch')
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14151.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14151.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..4fcf6af6db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/patches/openjpeg-CVE-2017-14151.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/commit/afb308b9ccbe129608c9205cf3bb39bbefad90b9.patch
+http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/09/06/1
+
+From afb308b9ccbe129608c9205cf3bb39bbefad90b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Even Rouault <even.rouault@spatialys.com>
+Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:20:37 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] Encoder: grow buffer size in
+ opj_tcd_code_block_enc_allocate_data() to avoid write heap buffer overflow in
+ opj_mqc_flush (#982)
+
+---
+ src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c | 7 +++++--
+ tests/nonregression/test_suite.ctest.in | 2 ++
+ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c b/src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c
+index 301c7213e..53cdcf64d 100644
+--- a/src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c
++++ b/src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c
+@@ -1187,8 +1187,11 @@ static OPJ_BOOL opj_tcd_code_block_enc_allocate_data(opj_tcd_cblk_enc_t *
+ {
+ OPJ_UINT32 l_data_size;
+
+- /* The +1 is needed for https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/835 */
+- l_data_size = 1 + (OPJ_UINT32)((p_code_block->x1 - p_code_block->x0) *
++ /* +1 is needed for https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/835 */
++ /* and actually +2 required for https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/982 */
++ /* TODO: is there a theoretical upper-bound for the compressed code */
++ /* block size ? */
++ l_data_size = 2 + (OPJ_UINT32)((p_code_block->x1 - p_code_block->x0) *
+ (p_code_block->y1 - p_code_block->y0) * (OPJ_INT32)sizeof(OPJ_UINT32));
+
+ if (l_data_size > p_code_block->data_size) {
+diff --git a/tests/nonregression/test_suite.ctest.in b/tests/nonregression/test_suite.ctest.in
+index aaf40d7d0..ffd964c2a 100644
+--- a/tests/nonregression/test_suite.ctest.in
++++ b/tests/nonregression/test_suite.ctest.in
+@@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ opj_compress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/Bretagne2.ppm -o @TEMP_PATH@/Bretagne2_empty_ban
+ # Same rate as Bretagne2_4.j2k
+ opj_compress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/Bretagne2.ppm -o @TEMP_PATH@/Bretagne2_empty_band_r800.j2k -t 2591,1943 -n 2 -r 800
+
++opj_compress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/issue982.bmp -o @TEMP_PATH@/issue982.j2k -n 1
++
+ # DECODER TEST SUITE
+ opj_decompress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/Bretagne2.j2k -o @TEMP_PATH@/Bretagne2.j2k.pgx
+ opj_decompress -i @INPUT_NR_PATH@/_00042.j2k -o @TEMP_PATH@/_00042.j2k.pgx
--
cgit 1.4.1