1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
PSM2 is the only valid implementation for OmniPath (OPA). UCX also
supports OmniPath, but it does so via Verbs, thus getting much lower
performance (typically 3 GiB/s instead of 10 GiB/s).
To work around that, give the mtl_psm2 component a higher priority
than the pml_ucx component.
See <https://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.open-mpi.org/msg33581.html>.
--- openmpi-4.0.2/ompi/mca/mtl/psm2/mtl_psm2_component.c 2019-11-15 17:06:15.142076840 +0100
+++ openmpi-4.0.2/ompi/mca/mtl/psm2/mtl_psm2_component.c 2019-11-15 17:06:22.242009379 +0100
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ ompi_mtl_psm2_component_register(void)
setenv("PSM2_DEVICES", "self,shm", 0);
}
- param_priority = 40;
+ param_priority = 55;
(void) mca_base_component_var_register (&mca_mtl_psm2_component.super.mtl_version,
"priority", "Priority of the PSM2 MTL component",
MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_INT, NULL, 0, 0,
Likewise for PSM: we want InfiniPath to be taken care of by PSM, not by UCX,
since UCX achieves worse performance.
--- openmpi-4.0.2/ompi/mca/mtl/psm/mtl_psm_component.c
+++ openmpi-4.0.2/ompi/mca/mtl/psm/mtl_psm_component.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ ompi_mtl_psm_component_register(void)
/* set priority high enough to beat ob1's default */
- param_priority = 30;
+ param_priority = 54;
(void) mca_base_component_var_register (&mca_mtl_psm_component.super.mtl_version,
"priority", "Priority of the PSM MTL component",
MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_INT, NULL, 0, 0,
|
