| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
configuration, TravisCI scripts and Dockerfile build appropriately.
There are a bunch of clean ups this enables but this commit doesn't
attempt them. We can do that in future commits.
|
|
Fixes klee/klee#717
delete on null pointer is always safe.
|
|
Request LLVM 3.4 as minimal requirement for KLEE
|
|
It became unnecessary when defining options and mainly undefined.
So introduce KLEE_LLVM_CL_VAL_END as suggested by @delcypher.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
|
|
assignments against the corresponding `Query` object and check the
assignment evaluates correctly.
This can be switched on using `-debug-assignment-validating-solver`
on the command line.
|
|
constant arrays.
|
|
* Making `Expr::compre(const Expr&, ExprEquivSet)` private and moving
its implementation into `Expr.cpp`.
* Document `Expr::compare(const Expr&)`.
This partially addresses #515 .
|
|
|
|
transitive dependencies on KLEE's libraries rather than on the final
binaries. This is better because it means we can build
other tools that use KLEE's libraries and not need to express the
needed LLVM dependencies.
It also makes it clearer what the dependencies are between KLEE
libraries. This has illustrated a problem with the `kleeBasic`
library. It contains `ConstructSolverChain.cpp` which clearly
belongs in `kleaverSolver` not in `kleeBasic`. This will be fixed
later.
|
|
This is based off intial work by @jirislaby in #481. However it
has been substantially modified.
Notably it includes a separate build sytem to build the runtimes which
is inspired by the old build system. The reason for doing this is
because CMake is not well suited for building the runtime:
* CMake is configured to use the host compiler, not the bitcode
compiler. These are not the same thing.
* Building the runtime using `add_custom_command()` is flawed
because we can't automatically get transitive depencies (i.e.
header file dependencies) unless the CMake generator is makefiles.
(See `IMPLICIT_DEPENDS` of `add_custom_command()` in CMake).
So for now we have a very simple build system for building the runtimes.
In the future we can replace this with something more sophisticated if
we need it.
Support for all features of the old build system are implemented apart
from recording the git revision and showing it in the output of
`klee --help`.
Another notable change is the CMake build system works much better with
LLVM installs which don't ship with testing tools. The build system
will download the sources for `FileCheck` and `not` tools if the
corresponding binaries aren't available and will build them. However
`lit` (availabe via `pip install lit`) and GTest must already be
installed.
Apart from better support for testing a significant advantage of the
new CMake build system compared to the existing "Autoconf/Makefile"
build system is that it is **not** coupled to LLVM's build system
(unlike the existing build system). This means that LLVM's
autoconf/Makefiles don't need to be installed somewhere on the system.
Currently all tests pass.
Support has been implemented in TravisCI and the Dockerfile for
building with CMake.
The existing "Autoconf/Makefile" build system has been left intact
and so both build systems can coexist for a short while. We should
remove the old build system as soon as possible though because it
creates an unnecessary maintance burden.
|
|
* Add unittest to check that the `Assignment` class can evaluate
expressions containing a `NotOptimizedExpr`.
* Fix the `AssignmentTest.FoldNotOptimized` unit test by
teaching the `ExprEvaluator` to fold `NotOptimizedExpr` nodes.
|
|
|
|
The address of KLEE-internal data structures should not influence the
order arrays are printed out.
Order arrays by name.
|
|
a message stating this.
|
|
that it's possible to call it from gdb.
|
|
|
|
The implementation of the constructor calls a method on a ``ConstantExpr``
which means the type must be complete (i.e. a forward declaration of
``ConstantExpr`` is insufficient) which creates an unnecessary ordering
Dependency in ``Expr.h``.
|
|
the ``ParserImpl`` it wouldn't free allocated ``Identifier``s
|
|
Some of these leaks were introduced by the factory constructor for Array
objects (f049ff3bc04daead8c3bb9f06e89e71e2054c82a) but a few others have
been around for far longer.
This leak was fixed by introducing a ``ArrayCache`` object which has two
purposes
* Retains ownership of all created ``Array`` objects and destroys them when
the ``ArrayCache`` destructor is called.
* Mimic the caching behaviour for symbolic arrays that was introduced
by f049ff3bc04daead8c3bb9f06e89e71e2054c82a where arrays with the same
name and size get "uniqued".
The Executor now maintains a ``arrayCache`` member that it uses and
passes by pointer to objects that need to construct ``Array`` objects (i.e.
``ObjectState``). This way when the Executor is destroyed all the
``Array`` objects get freed which seems like the right time to do this.
For Kleaver the ``ParserImpl`` has a ``TheArrayCache`` member that is
used for building ``Array`` objects. This means that the Parser must
live as long as the built expressions will be used otherwise we will
have a use after free. I'm not sure this is the right design choice.
It might be better to transfer ownership of the ``Array`` objects to
the root ``Decl`` returned by the parser.
|
|
The overloaded assignment operator previously only deleted the head
``UpdateNode`` if the ``UpdateList`` had exclusive ownership which left the remaining
list of ``UpdateNode``s dangling if those nodes had ``refCount`` of 1.
To fix this the logic that was previously in the ``UpdateList`` destructor
for deleting nodes that were exclusively referenced by the UpdateList
has been moved into ``UpdateList::tryFreeNodes()`` so that it can be
called from ``UpdateList::operator=()``.
It looks like this bug has been in KLEE since the beginning.
|
|
always goes to zero (matches LLVM's APInt::ashr(...)). This is meant
to partially address issue #218.
There are a few problems with this commit
* It is possible for AShrExpr to not be abbreviated because the scan
methods will not see that we print the 0th child of the AShrExpr twice
* The added test case should really be run through an SMT solver (
i.e. STP) but that requires infrastructure changes.
|
|
the optimisation that rewrites existing constraints when an equality with a constant is added
|
|
patch.
|
|
holycrap872-ArrayFactory
|
|
The way that Arrays were handled in the past led to the possibility of
aliasing issues. This occured whenever a new branch discovered an array
for the first time. Each branch would create a new instance of the same
array without seeing if it had been created before. Therefore, should a
new branch encounter the same state as some previous branch, the
previous branch's solution wouldn't satisfy the new state since they
didn't recognize they were referencing the same array. By creating an
array factory that creates a single symbolic array, that problem is
handled. Note: Concrete arrays should not be created by the factory
method since their values are never shared between branches.
The factory works by seeing if an array with a similar hash has been
created before (the hash is based on the name and size of array). If
there has been it then searches through all of the arrays with the same
hash (stored in a vector) to see if there is one with an exact match.
If there is one, the address of this previously created equivalent
array is returned. Otherwise, the newly created array is unique, it is
added to the map, and it's address is returned.
This aliasing issue can be seen by comparing the output of the
Dogfood/ImmutableSet.cpp test cases with and with out this commit.
Both act correctly, but the number of queries making it to the solver
in the previous version is much greater 244 vs 211. This is because
the UBTree in the CexCachingSolver and the cache in the CachingSolver
do not recognize queries whose solutions were previously calculated
because it doesn't think the arrays in the two queries are the same.
While this does not cause an error, it does mean that extra calls are
made.
|
|
than writing "(not (= a b))". This makes the code simpler and queries
slightly simpler.
|
|
ExprSMTLIBPrinter
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patch introduces nested let-abbreviations in the ExprSMTLIBPrinter
to reduce the size of the SMTLIBv2 queries and the corresponding processing
time (bugfix for #170).
The current implementation of the let abbreviation mode does not consider
expression intra-dependencies and prints all abbreviations in the same
let scope. For a (simplified) example, it prints
(assert (let ( (?B1 (A + B)) (?B2 (A + B + C)) ) (= ?B1 ?B2) ) ).
This is extremely inefficient if the expressions (and there many of these!)
extensively reuse their subexpressions. Therefore, it's better to print
the query with nested let-expressions by reusing existing expression bindings
in the new let scope:
(assert (let ( (?B1 (A + B)) ) (let ( (?B2 (?B1 + C)) ) (= ?B1 ?B2) ) ) ).
This patch adds a new function ExprSMTLIBPrinter::scanBindingExprDeps() that
scans bindings for expression dependencies. The result is a vector of
new bindings (orderedBindings) that represents the expression dependency tree.
When printing in the let-abbreviation mode, the new code starts with
abbreviating expressions that have no dependencies and then gradually makes
these new bindings available in the upcoming let-scopes where expressions
with dependencies reuse them.
The effect of nested let-abbreviations is comparable to :named abbreviations.
However, the latter mode is not supported by the majority of the solvers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
single method with two different implementations.
There is one version of this method for human readability
(printHumanReadableQuery()) and a version for machine consumption
(printMachineReadableQuery()).
The reason for having two versions is because different behaviour is
needed in different scenarios
* In machine readable mode the entire query is printed inside a single
``(assert ...)``. This is done to allow ``(let ...)`` to abbreviate
as much as possible.
* In human readable mode each constraint and query expression is printed
inside its own ``(assert ...)`` unless the abbreviation mode is
ABBR_LET in which case all constraints and query expr are printed
inside a single ``(assert ...)`` much like in the machine readable mode
Whilst I was here I also fixed a bug handling identation when printing
``(let ...)`` expressions in printAssert()
|
|
* Set the default abbreviation mode to let (ExprSMTLIBPrinter::ABBR_LET)
* Remove the now defunct ExprSMTLIBLetPrinter
* Improve performance of ExprSMTLIBPrinter::scan() by keeping
track of visited Expr to avoid visiting them again
* Rename ExprSMTLIBPrinter::printQuery() to ExprSMTLIBPrinter::printQueryExpr()
|
|
|
|
|
|
iostream injects static constructor function into every compilation unit.
Remove this to avoid it.
|
|
According to LLVM: lightweight and simpler implementation of streams.
|
|
This now corresponds to the sorts of the operations we emit, as far as I
can tell.
Read is one example of an operation that now works correctly (with 1-bit
array ranges).
It's also possible (but not very useful, and I don't think KLEE can
produce it) for other operations such as Add to operate on 1-bit values,
and this patch also fixes those.
|
|
lists can have NULL roots, e.g. in MemoryObject instances with concrete
contents, where root is allocated lazily only when the updates are required).
Also checking whether array updates are typed correctly in UpdateList::extend()
rather than in the constructor of UpdateNode (only for update lists with
non-NULL roots).
|
|
|
|
This change makes it possible to more reliably write unit tests which check
that an expression is equivalent to an expected pretty printed string.
|
|
(alphabetical) order.
|
|
|
|
|
