From 818a0bd6f1b3305351d482eeab4e9e64c2af3a18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nguyễn Gia Phong Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:45:21 +0700 Subject: Migrate *the rest* of the math blogs --- fun/conseq.md | 309 ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 309 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 fun/conseq.md (limited to 'fun') diff --git a/fun/conseq.md b/fun/conseq.md deleted file mode 100644 index f705649..0000000 --- a/fun/conseq.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,309 +0,0 @@ -+++ -title = "Infinite Sequences: A Case Study in Functional Python" -hascode = true -date = Date(2019, 2, 28) -rss = "SICP subsection 3.5.2 in Python" -+++ -@def tags = ["sicp", "fun", "python", "calculus"] - -# Infinite Sequences: A Case Study in Functional Python - -In this article, we will only consider sequences defined by a function -whose domain is a subset of the set of all integers. Such sequences will be -*visualized*, i.e. we will try to evaluate the first few (thousand) elements, -using functional programming paradigm, where functions are more similar -to the ones in math (in contrast to imperative style with side effects -confusing to inexperenced coders). The idea is taken from [subsection 3.5.2 -of SICP][] and adapted to Python, which, compare to Scheme, is significantly -more popular: Python is pre-installed on almost every modern Unix-like system, -namely macOS, GNU/Linux and the \*BSDs; and even at MIT, the new 6.01 in Python -has recently replaced the legendary 6.001 (SICP). - -One notable advantage of using Python is its huge **standard** library. -For example the *identity sequence* (sequence defined by the identity function) -can be imported directly from ``itertools``: - -```python ->>> from itertools import count ->>> positive_integers = count(start=1) ->>> next(positive_integers) -1 ->>> next(positive_integers) -2 ->>> for _ in range(4): next(positive_integers) -... -3 -4 -5 -6 -``` - -To open a Python emulator, simply lauch your terminal and run `python`. -If that is somehow still too struggling, navigate to [the interactive shell][] -on Python.org. - -*Let's get it started* with somethings everyone hates: recursively defined -sequences, e.g. the famous Fibonacci ($F_n = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2}$, -$F_1 = 1$ and $F_0 = 0$). Since [Python does not support][] [tail recursion][], -it's generally **not** a good idea to define anything recursively (which is, -ironically, the only trivial *functional* solution in this case) -but since we will only evaluate the first few terms -(use the **Tab** key to indent the line when needed): - -```python ->>> def fibonacci(n, a=0, b=1): -... # To avoid making the code look complicated, -... # n < 0 is not handled here. -... return a if n == 0 else fibonacci(n - 1, b, a + b) -... ->>> fibo_seq = (fibonacci(n) for n in count(start=0)) ->>> for _ in range(7): next(fibo_seq) -... -0 -1 -1 -2 -3 -5 -8 -``` - -@@colbox-blue -The `fibo_seq` above is just to demonstrate how `itertools.count` -can be use to create an infinite sequence defined by a function. -For better performance, this should be used instead: - -```python -def fibonacci_sequence(a=0, b=1): - yield a - yield from fibonacci_sequence(b, a + b) -``` -@@ - -It is noticable that the elements having been iterated through (using `next`) -will disappear forever in the void (oh no!), but that is the cost we are -willing to pay to save some memory, especially when we need to evaluate a -member of (arbitrarily) large index to estimate the sequence's limit. -One case in point is estimating a definite integral using [left Riemann sum][]. - -```python -def integral(f, a, b): - def left_riemann_sum(n): - dx = (b-a) / n - def x(i): return a + i*dx - return sum(f(x(i)) for i in range(n)) * dx - return left_riemann_sum -``` - -The function `integral(f, a, b)` as defined above returns a function taking -$n$ as an argument. As $n\to\infty$, its result approaches -$\int_a^b f(x)\mathrm d x$. For example, we are going to estimate -$\pi$ as the area of a semicircle whose radius is $\sqrt 2$: - -```python ->>> from math import sqrt ->>> def semicircle(x): return sqrt(abs(2 - x*x)) -... ->>> pi = integral(semicircle, -sqrt(2), sqrt(2)) ->>> pi_seq = (pi(n) for n in count(start=2)) ->>> for _ in range(3): next(pi_seq) -... -2.000000029802323 -2.514157464087051 -2.7320508224700384 -``` - -Whilst the first few aren't quite close, at index around 1000, -the result is somewhat acceptable: - -``` -3.1414873191059525 -3.1414874770617427 -3.1414876346231577 -``` - -Since we are comfortable with sequence of sums, let's move on to sums of -a sequence, which are called series. For estimation, again, we are going to -make use of infinite sequences of partial sums, which are implemented as -`itertools.accumulate` by thoughtful Python developers. [Geometric][] and -[p-series][] can be defined as follow: - -```python -from itertools import accumulate as partial_sums - -def geometric_series(r, a=1): - return partial_sums(a*r**n for n in count(0)) - -def p_series(p): - return partial_sums(1 / n**p for n in count(1)) -``` - -We can then use these to determine whether a series is convergent or divergent. -For instance, one can easily verify that the $p$-series with $p = 2$ -converges to $\pi^2 / 6 \approx 1.6449340668482264$ via - -```python ->>> s = p_series(p=2) ->>> for _ in range(11): next(s) -... -1.0 -1.25 -1.3611111111111112 -1.4236111111111112 -1.4636111111111112 -1.4913888888888889 -1.511797052154195 -1.527422052154195 -1.5397677311665408 -1.5497677311665408 -1.558032193976458 -``` - -We can observe that it takes quite a lot of steps to get the precision we would -generally expect ($s_{11}$ is only precise to the first decimal place; -second decimal places: $s_{101}$; third: $s_{2304}$). -Luckily, many techniques for series acceleration are available. -[Shanks transformation][] for instance, can be implemented as follow: - -```python -from itertools import islice, tee - -def shanks(seq): - return map(lambda x, y, z: (x*z - y*y) / (x + z - y*2), - *(islice(t, i, None) for i, t in enumerate(tee(seq, 3)))) -``` - -In the code above, `lambda x, y, z: (x*z - y*y) / (x + z - y*2)` denotes -the anonymous function $(x, y, z) \mapsto \frac{xz - y^2}{x + z - 2y}$ -and `map` is a higher order function applying that function to -respective elements of subsequences starting from index 1, 2 and 3 of `seq`. -On Python 2, one should import `imap` from `itertools` to get the same -[lazy][] behavior of `map` on Python 3. - -```python ->>> s = shanks(p_series(2)) ->>> for _ in range(10): next(s) -... -1.4500000000000002 -1.503968253968257 -1.53472222222223 -1.5545202020202133 -1.5683119658120213 -1.57846371882088 -1.5862455815659202 -1.5923993101138652 -1.5973867787856946 -1.6015104548459742 -``` - -The result was quite satisfying, yet we can do one step futher -by continuously applying the transformation to the sequence: - -```python ->>> def compose(transform, seq): -... yield next(seq) -... yield from compose(transform, transform(seq)) -... ->>> s = compose(shanks, p_series(2)) ->>> for _ in range(10): next(s) -... -1.0 -1.503968253968257 -1.5999812811165188 -1.6284732442271674 -1.6384666832276524 -1.642311342667821 -1.6425249569252578 -1.640277484549416 -1.6415443295058203 -1.642038043478661 -``` - -Shanks transformation works on every sequence (not just sequences of -partial sums). Back to previous example of using left Riemann sum -to compute definite integral: - -```python ->>> pi_seq = compose(shanks, map(pi, count(2))) ->>> for _ in range(10): next(pi_seq) -... -2.000000029802323 -2.978391111182236 -3.105916845397819 -3.1323116570377185 -3.1389379264270736 -3.140788413965646 -3.140921512857936 -3.1400282163913436 -3.1400874774021816 -3.1407097229603256 ->>> next(islice(pi_seq, 300, None)) -3.1415061302492413 -``` - -Now having series defined, let's see if we can learn anything -about power series. Sequence of partial sums of power series -$\sum c_n (x - a)^n$ can be defined as - -```python -from operator import mul - -def power_series(c, start=0, a=0): - return lambda x: partial_sums(map(mul, c, (x**n for n in count(start)))) -``` - -We can use this to compute functions that can be written as -[Taylor series][]: - -```python -from math import factorial -def exp(x): - return power_series(1/factorial(n) for n in count(0))(x) - -def cos(x): - c = ((1 - n%2) * (1 - n%4) / factorial(n) for n in count(0)) - return power_series(c)(x) - -def sin(x): - c = (n%2 * (2 - n%4) / factorial(n) for n in count(1)) - return power_series(c, start=1)(x) -``` - -Amazing! Let's test 'em! - -```python ->>> e = compose(shanks, exp(1)) # this should converges to 2.718281828459045 ->>> for _ in range(4): next(e) -... -1.0 -2.749999999999996 -2.718276515152136 -2.718281825486623 -``` - -Impressive, huh? For sine and cosine, series acceleration is not even necessary: - -```python ->>> from math import pi as PI ->>> s = sin(PI/6) ->>> for _ in range(5): next(s) -... -0.5235987755982988 -0.5235987755982988 -0.49967417939436376 -0.49967417939436376 -0.5000021325887924 ->>> next(islice(cos(PI/3), 8, None)) -0.500000433432915 -``` - -[subsection 3.5.2 of SICP]: https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/sicp/full-text/book/book-Z-H-24.html#%_sec_3.5.2 -[the interactive shell]: https://www.python.org/shell -[Python does not support]: http://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2009/04/final-words-on-tail-calls.html -[tail recursion]: https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/sicp/full-text/book/book-Z-H-11.html#call_footnote_Temp_48 -[left Riemann sum]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_sum#Left_Riemann_sum -[Geometric]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series -[p-series]: https://math.oregonstate.edu/home/programs/undergrad/CalculusQuestStudyGuides/SandS/SeriesTests/p-series.html -[Shanks transformation]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanks_transformation -[lazy]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_evaluation -[Taylor series]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series -- cgit 1.4.1