about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/content/free-guide/why-free-sw.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/free-guide/why-free-sw.md')
-rw-r--r--content/free-guide/why-free-sw.md54
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 54 deletions
diff --git a/content/free-guide/why-free-sw.md b/content/free-guide/why-free-sw.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 2a389fb..0000000
--- a/content/free-guide/why-free-sw.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
----
-title: "Why you should use free software?"
-date: 2021-06-24
-layout: wiki
-wiki: freeguide
-tags: [compilation, "free software", "proprietary", reason]
----
-
-Free software is about freedom, not price[^1].  *Freedom* here refers to:
-
-0. The freedom to **run** the program as you wish, for any purpose
-   (**freedom 0**).
-1. The freedom to **study** how the program works, and **change** it so it
-   does your computing as you wish (**freedom 1**). Access to the source code
-   is a precondition for this.
-2. The freedom to **redistribute** copies so you can help others
-   (**freedom 2**).
-3. The freedom to **distribute copies of your modified versions** to others
-   (**freedom 3**). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
-   benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for
-   this.
-
-At first glance, you would think that most users would only benefit from
-**freedom 0** and **freedom 2**.  While it is true that most would not
-exercise freedom 1 and freedom 3, they do indirectly benefits users.  Because
-the original programmers allows derivative programs to be distributed, they
-cannot implement malicious anti-features, such as spying or fraud without being
-spotted.  Being free software is thus the prerequisite for being
-user-respecting software.
-
-There are of course competing reasons for choosing software, such as
-user-friendliness/ease-of-use.  While these requirements are rather subjective,
-I do agree that some free software programs have less fancy UI (like ) and
-sometimes not easy to use (like GIMP).  It is up to you to decide the balance
-between criteria, but there is certainly strong reasons to prefer free
-software, *ceteris paribus*[^2]
-
-The content below consists of lists of bad examples of proprietary software, as
-well as some example of free software turning bad[^3] which resulted in forks.
-
-(It's empty right now, see GNU list below or contribute)
-
------
-
-Other lists:
-
-- [GNU's list of malicious functionalities with references][gnu-list]
-
-[gnu-list]: https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary.html
-
-[^1]: <https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html>
-  The word "free" was used despite its ambiguity for lack of better word.
-[^2]: All else being equal, but in fancy Latin.
-[^3]: Subjective, I know.