about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/16 - Choosing a Model - lang_en_vs4.srt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/16 - Choosing a Model - lang_en_vs4.srt')
-rw-r--r--usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/16 - Choosing a Model - lang_en_vs4.srt179
1 files changed, 179 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/16 - Choosing a Model - lang_en_vs4.srt b/usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/16 - Choosing a Model - lang_en_vs4.srt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d898337
--- /dev/null
+++ b/usth/ICT2.7/P1L2 Life Cycle Models Subtitles/16 - Choosing a Model - lang_en_vs4.srt
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+1

+00:00:00,100 --> 00:00:02,860

+We just saw several software process models, and there

+

+2

+00:00:02,860 --> 00:00:06,330

+are many, many more. And because these process models define

+

+3

+00:00:06,330 --> 00:00:09,330

+the master plan for our project, the specific process

+

+4

+00:00:09,330 --> 00:00:12,220

+model that we choose has as much influence over a

+

+5

+00:00:12,220 --> 00:00:15,700

+project's success as any other major planning decision that

+

+6

+00:00:15,700 --> 00:00:18,610

+we make. Therefore, it is very important that we pick

+

+7

+00:00:18,610 --> 00:00:22,100

+the appropriate model for our development process. Picking an appropriate

+

+8

+00:00:22,100 --> 00:00:25,100

+model can ensure the success of a project. On the

+

+9

+00:00:25,100 --> 00:00:27,830

+contrary, if we choose the wrong model, that can be a

+

+10

+00:00:27,830 --> 00:00:31,010

+constant source of problems and ultimately, it can make the project

+

+11

+00:00:31,010 --> 00:00:33,830

+fail. So how can we choose the right model for a

+

+12

+00:00:33,830 --> 00:00:36,310

+project? To be able to do so, we have to take into

+

+13

+00:00:36,310 --> 00:00:40,490

+consideration many factors. In particular, we need to be aware of

+

+14

+00:00:40,490 --> 00:00:44,390

+what level of understanding we have of the requirements. Do we understand

+

+15

+00:00:44,390 --> 00:00:46,720

+all the requirements? Are we going to be able to collect all

+

+16

+00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:50,430

+the requirements in advance, or collecting requirements is going to be hard and

+

+17

+00:00:50,430 --> 00:00:53,460

+therefore, we might want to follow a process that is more flexible

+

+18

+00:00:53,460 --> 00:00:57,470

+with that respect. Another important point is the expected lifetime of the

+

+19

+00:00:57,470 --> 00:01:00,300

+project. Is this a quick project that we are putting together for

+

+20

+00:01:00,300 --> 00:01:03,100

+a specific purpose or something that's going to last for for a number

+

+21

+00:01:03,100 --> 00:01:05,910

+of years and that we're going to maintain over all those years?

+

+22

+00:01:05,910 --> 00:01:08,380

+That's going to make a difference in the way we decide to develop

+

+23

+00:01:08,380 --> 00:01:12,190

+that project. Also, what is the level of risk involved? Do we

+

+24

+00:01:12,190 --> 00:01:15,530

+know the domain very well? Do we know exactly the technologies involved?

+

+25

+00:01:15,530 --> 00:01:19,100

+Well, if so, we might go with a more traditional process. Otherwise,

+

+26

+00:01:19,100 --> 00:01:21,902

+we might want to be more agile, more flexible. It is also

+

+27

+00:01:21,902 --> 00:01:24,900

+very important to know the schedule constraints. How much time, how many

+

+28

+00:01:24,900 --> 00:01:28,640

+resources do we have for this project? What is the expected interaction

+

+29

+00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:31,870

+with the management and the customer? In particular for this ladder, there

+

+30

+00:01:31,870 --> 00:01:34,840

+are many processes that rely on the fact that there can be

+

+31

+00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:38,310

+a continuous interaction with the customer. If that interaction is not there,

+

+32

+00:01:38,310 --> 00:01:41,230

+there's no way we are going to be able to use these processes.

+

+33

+00:01:41,230 --> 00:01:44,580

+Conversely, there are processes that don't require the presence of the customer

+

+34

+00:01:44,580 --> 00:01:47,868

+at all, except for the initial phase and maybe some checking points and

+

+35

+00:01:47,868 --> 00:01:51,020

+so if the customer is very inaccessible, we might want to follow

+

+36

+00:01:51,020 --> 00:01:53,740

+one of those processes, instead of one of the more demanding ones in

+

+37

+00:01:53,740 --> 00:01:57,340

+terms of customer's time. Finally, it is important to take into account

+

+38

+00:01:57,340 --> 00:02:00,450

+the level of the expertise of the people involved. Do we have people

+

+39

+00:02:00,450 --> 00:02:02,730

+that know the technologies that we're using? Do we know people that

+

+40

+00:02:02,730 --> 00:02:04,590

+know a specific kind of process?

+

+41

+00:02:04,590 --> 00:02:06,930

+Some processes require some specific expertise and

+

+42

+00:02:06,930 --> 00:02:09,320

+we're not going to be able to follow that process if we don't

+

+43

+00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:12,410

+have the right expertise. So we need to take into account all of

+

+44

+00:02:12,410 --> 00:02:15,570

+these aspects, and sometimes more, in order to be able to make

+

+45

+00:02:15,570 --> 00:02:19,560

+the right decision and pick the right software process model for our project.