1 files changed, 0 insertions, 47 deletions
diff --git a/usth/ICT2.7/P2L2 OO Software Engineering and UML Subtitles/35 - Recap Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt b/usth/ICT2.7/P2L2 OO Software Engineering and UML Subtitles/35 - Recap Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt
deleted file mode 100644
index 1172c26..0000000
--- a/usth/ICT2.7/P2L2 OO Software Engineering and UML Subtitles/35 - Recap Quiz Solution - lang_en_vs4.srt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-1
-00:00:00,095 --> 00:00:03,320
-A UML state transition diagram does not specify a set
-
-2
-00:00:03,320 --> 00:00:05,960
-of object that work together to perform some action, because
-
-3
-00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:09,270
-this is what a sequence diagram does instead. Conversely, the
-
-4
-00:00:09,270 --> 00:00:12,530
-second one is correct. As we said, a state transition diagram
-
-5
-00:00:12,530 --> 00:00:15,790
-describes the events that cause a transition from one state
-
-6
-00:00:15,790 --> 00:00:19,300
-to another. Again, a UML state transition diagram does not
-
-7
-00:00:19,300 --> 00:00:22,270
-specify the set of components in a system, because this
-
-8
-00:00:22,270 --> 00:00:25,700
-is what a component diagram does, not a state transition diagram.
-
-9
-00:00:25,700 --> 00:00:27,620
-As for the last one, this is correct,
-
-10
-00:00:27,620 --> 00:00:30,510
-because, as we also discussed, a state transition diagram
-
-11
-00:00:30,510 --> 00:00:33,000
-describes the actions that result from a state
-
-12
-00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:35,890
-change, that is, the effects of such state change.