1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/usth/MATH2.4/labwork/2/report.tex b/usth/MATH2.4/labwork/2/report.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c4481fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/usth/MATH2.4/labwork/2/report.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
+\usepackage[english,vietnamese]{babel}
+\usepackage{amsmath}
+\usepackage{lmodern}
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+\usepackage{tikz}
+
+\newcommand{\exercise}[1]{\noindent\textbf{#1.}}
+\renewcommand{\thesection}{\Roman{section}}
+\renewcommand*{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
+
+\title{Numerical Method: Labwork 2 Report}
+\author{Nguyễn Gia Phong--BI9-184}
+\date{Fall 2019}
+
+\begin{document}
+\maketitle
+\setcounter{section}{2}
+\section{Polynomial}
+\exercise{1.c} At the time of writing, function \verb|fzero|
+in Octave have not support the \verb|Display| option
+just yet\footnote{Bug report: \url{https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56954}}.
+However, the implementation of this option is rather trivial,
+thus I made a quick patch (which is also attached at the bug report).
+Using this, one can easily display all the iterations as followed:
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+octave:1> fzero (@(x) x.^2 - 9, 0, optimset ('display', 'iter'))
+
+Search for an interval around 0 containing a sign change:
+Func-eval 1,  how = initial,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0,  f(b) = -9
+Func-eval 2,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0.099,  f(b) = -8.9902
+Func-eval 3,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0.1025,  f(b) = -8.98949
+Func-eval 4,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0.095,  f(b) = -8.99098
+Func-eval 5,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0.11,  f(b) = -8.9879
+Func-eval 6,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0.075,  f(b) = -8.99437
+Func-eval 7,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0.15,  f(b) = -8.9775
+Func-eval 8,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0,  f(b) = -9
+Func-eval 9,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 0.35,  f(b) = -8.8775
+Func-eval 10,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = -0.4,  f(b) = -8.84
+Func-eval 11,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = 1.1,  f(b) = -7.79
+Func-eval 12,  how = search,  a = 0,  f(a) = -9,  b = -4.9,  f(b) = 15.01
+
+Search for a a zero in the interval [-4.9, 0]:
+Func-eval 13,  how = initial,  x = 0,  f(x) = -9
+Func-eval 14,  how = interpolation,  x = -1.83673,  f(x) = -5.62641  (NaN%)
+Func-eval 15,  how = interpolation,  x = -3.36837,  f(x) = 2.3459  (141.7%)
+Func-eval 16,  how = interpolation,  x = -3.19097,  f(x) = 1.1823  (-49.6%)
+Func-eval 17,  how = interpolation,  x = -2.99725,  f(x) = -0.0164972  (-101.4%)
+Func-eval 18,  how = interpolation,  x = -3.00258,  f(x) = 0.0154927  (193.9%)
+Func-eval 19,  how = interpolation,  x = -3,  f(x) = 3.07975e-07  (-100.0%)
+Func-eval 20,  how = interpolation,  x = -3,  f(x) = -7.10543e-15  (-100.0%)
+Func-eval 21,  how = interpolation,  x = -3,  f(x) = 5.32907e-15  (169.7%)
+
+Algorithm converged
+
+ans = -3.0000
+\end{verbatim}
+
+To answer the question in part b, (since I believe these parts are linked
+to each other), the current implementation of \verb|fzero| search for
+the second bracket over quantitative chages below if \verb|X0| if it is a
+single scalar, thus $[-4.9, 0]$ is gotten and the found solution is negative:
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+[-.01 +.025 -.05 +.10 -.25 +.50 -1 +2.5 -5 +10 -50 +100 -500 +1000]
+\end{verbatim}
+
+\section{Non-linear Systems}
+\exercise{1.a} These statements were used to plot the given functions:
+\begin{verbatim}
+ezplot(@(x1, x2) x1 .^ 2 + x1 .* x2 - 10)
+hold on
+ezplot(@(x1, x2) x2 + 3 .* x1 .* x2 .^ 2 - 57)
+\end{verbatim}
+
+As shown in the graphs (where $x_1^2 + x_1 x_2 = 10$ are the blue lines
+and $x_2 + 3 x_1 x_2 = 57$ are the yellow ones), the solutions of $(x_1, x_2)$
+are quite close to $(2, 3)$ and $(4.5, -2)$.
+
+\begin{figure}[!h]
+  \centering
+  \scalebox{0.37}{\input{2a.tikz}}
+\end{figure}
+
+I would also like to note that I am personally impressed how gnuplot
+(which is utilised by Octave) is able to export to TikZ graphics with ease.
+\end{document}