diff options
author | Ngô Ngọc Đức Huy <huyngo@disroot.org> | 2021-09-04 15:45:10 +0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ngô Ngọc Đức Huy <huyngo@disroot.org> | 2021-09-04 15:45:10 +0700 |
commit | 5328c7079eb252b636eb8b3878a29a3534e84d21 (patch) | |
tree | 4e99b1f6352c30c131406fd4340b110c8b1a86ea /content/book-reviews | |
parent | 7c93580566c4f4fc94399011dbba95a484f3f3fa (diff) | |
download | blog-5328c7079eb252b636eb8b3878a29a3534e84d21.tar.gz |
Increase heading level
Diffstat (limited to 'content/book-reviews')
-rw-r--r-- | content/book-reviews/relevant-search.md | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | content/book-reviews/xkcd-what-if.md | 8 |
2 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/content/book-reviews/relevant-search.md b/content/book-reviews/relevant-search.md index 23b7374..e46ac91 100644 --- a/content/book-reviews/relevant-search.md +++ b/content/book-reviews/relevant-search.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ lang: en layout: books --- -# Summary -## The search relevance problem +## Summary +### The search relevance problem Given an increasingly large amount of information, it is infeasible for users to retrieve what they needed. Relevance scoring is therefore essential for @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Even the academic field that thoroughly study this problem, information retrieval is not a one-size-fit all solution. Relevance is strongly tied with the field and the application purpose. -## Tackling the problem +### Tackling the problem The book approaches the problem first by a top-down analysis of how a typical search engine works. It then shows how a search query is processed by the @@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ authors also approach the problem from business view: they note that interdiscipline collaboration is important in order to define and increase relevance. -# Comments +## Comments -## What I like +### What I like The book approaches the problem from various views: business view, algorithmic view, and practical view (giving examples). The book accentuates the diversity @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ of problems and thereby encouraging readers to critically think of their own problems. While it suggests that search results should be influenced by sponsors, it also notes that without balance that will as well lead to failure. -## What I don't like +### What I don't like Its structure is somewhat unclear and flow to me. I think some chapters can be re-ordered so it's more logical. Also, I find weighing sponsors' priorities diff --git a/content/book-reviews/xkcd-what-if.md b/content/book-reviews/xkcd-what-if.md index 40f4f9b..1f93402 100644 --- a/content/book-reviews/xkcd-what-if.md +++ b/content/book-reviews/xkcd-what-if.md @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ lang: en layout: books --- -# Summary -# Comments +## Summary +## Comments -## What I like +### What I like -## What I don't like +### What I don't like |