path: root/content/posts/2022-01-16-dict-1.md

---
title: "Implementing DICT protocol: Part 1"
date: 2022-01-16
lang: en
categories: [ blog ]
tags: [dict, dictionary, go, golang, rfc2229, tcp ]
draft: true
translationKey: "2022-01-16-Dict-1"
---

## DICT Protocol

What is DICT protocol?

<figure>
  <blockquote>
    <p>
    The Dictionary Server Protocol (DICT) is a TCP transaction based
    query/response protocol that allows a client to access dictionary
    definitions from a set of natural language dictionary databases.
    </p>
    <figcaption>
      <cite>
        <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2229">
          DICT Protocol - RFC 2229
        </a>
      </cite>
    </figcaption>
  </blockquote>
</figure>

Notable implementations for this include [dict(d)][dict]
and [GNU dico(d)][dico]; the former is the reference implementation that
supports multiple database formats, as listed in [dictfmt (1)][man-dictfmt].

[dict]: https://github.com/cheusov/dictd
[dico]: https://www.gnu.org.ua/software/dico/
[man-dictfmt]: https://linux.die.net/man/1/dictfmt

I intend to implement a server and multiple clients (CLI, GUI, ~~web~~) to this
protocol, as well as some tools to easily create a dictd-readable database.

## Why?

No practical reason, but [dict] is one of the first command line tool
introduced to me and easily one of my favorite, along with curl and [jq][jq].
It's basically just a dictionary app, but it's cool:

- works perfectly in terminal
- easily self-hostable
- fast
- has cool dictionaries (though only Debian, Arch and derivatives distribute
  those)

[jq]: /posts/2021-06-13-jq/

Also, I'm writing dictionaries for my [conlangs][conlang] and I want to
distribute them via this protocol.  Clearly, implementing a server that is
already implemented doesn't help, but I tend to go down rabbit holes.

[conlang]: /misc/#conlangs

I also like to explore non-web protocols, and starting with something simple
like DICT might be a good idea.

## Reading the spec

The spec (linked at the top of this post) is shorter and easier to read than I
thought.  Ignoring the introduction,  examples and citation, it's les than 20
pages.  There are five classes of commands:

- Querying the database: `DEFINE`, `MATCH`
- `SHOW` metadata about the servers and the databases
- Utilities: informing `CLIENT` name, check `STATUS`, show `HELP`, show
    `OPTION` and `QUIT`
- Authentication: `AUTH` and `SASLAUTH`

The authentication ones are optional, and I don't find that useful, so I
won't implement it anyway, this limits to the first three categories.

## Handling TCP

DICT is based on <abbr title="Transmission Control Protocol">TCP</abbr>,
and there is a neat interactive <abbr>TCP</abbr> tool called [`telnet`][telnet],
which I used for testing the commands.

[telnet]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telnet

### telnet

DICT runs on port 2628:

```sh
$ telnet dict.org 2628
Trying 199.48.130.6...
Connected to dict.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 dict.dict.org dictd 1.12.1/rf on Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 <auth.mime> <89168346.27665.1642303045@dict.dict.org>
```

Let's try out some commands to understand how this work.  Note that I prefix
the command with `~> ` here so that it stands out of the response, and truncate
long results with `[...]`.

Let's first show what databases there are

```
~> SHOW DB
110 166 databases present
[...]
.
250 ok
```

There are a lot of dictionaries here, including [GCIDE][gcide], [WordNet][wn],
[The Jargon File][jargon], [V.E.R.A.][vera], [FOLDOC][foldoc], but most of them
are [FreeDict][fd] dictionaries.

To  a word, the syntax is

```
~> MATCH database strategy word
```

Strategy is how the server will match the word you're looking up.  To list all
strategies available, send the command:

```
~> SHOW STRATEGIES
```

There are various strategies supported by dictd, for example, `substring`,
which matches if the entry has the queried word as substring:

```
~> MATCH jargon substring program
152 13 matches found
jargon "c programmer's disease"
jargon "cargo cult programming"
jargon "mickey mouse program"
jargon "perfect programmer syndrome"
jargon "program"
[...]
.
250 ok [d/m/c = 0/13/5775; 0.000r 0.000u 0.000s]
```

This command only show which words in the database, if any, satisfy the match,
without showing the definition.  To actually view a definition, one has to
supply the dictionary name to the `DEFINE` command.  Note that, you can also
use `*` for both `DEFINE` and `MATCH` command, which will define/match for all
dictionaries.

```
~> DEFINE * programming
150 3 definitions retrieved
151 "programming" wn "WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006)"
programming
    [...]
.
151 "programming" jargon "The Jargon File (version 4.4.7, 29 Dec 2003)"
programming
 n.

    [...]

.
151 "programming" foldoc "The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing (30 December 2018)"
programming

.
250 ok [d/m/c = 3/0/145; 0.000r 0.000u 0.000s]
```

That's a gist of how to look up words with DICT protocol.  You can find more
commands with:

```
~> HELP
[...]
.
250 ok
```

Finally, to end the session, the command is:

```
~> QUIT
221 bye [d/m/c = 0/0/0; 123.000r 0.000u 0.000s]
```

Note that, the response always ends with a period and a `250 ok`
response---this is equivalent to HTTP's 200 OK---except for `QUIT`. These
response code are defined in [the protocol specification][rfc2229].

Commands other than `HELP` has some additional statistics, though this is
optional.  I figured out that `d` means definitions, `m` means matches, and `s`
is probably the time it took to query (why are they always zero, though?), but
no clues on what `c`, `r`, and `u` mean.  I might check the [source code][dict]
to figure that out, but let's leave it for another time.

[gcide]: https://gcide.gnu.org.ua/
[wn]: https://wordnet.princeton.edu/
[jargon]: http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/
[foldoc]: https://foldoc.org/
[vera]: https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/vera
[fd]: https://freedict.org/
[rfc2229]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2229#page-23

### Go

Of course we are not going to make the users type these commands (though it's
not too unintuitive and can be easily remembered).  I chose Go to build the CLI
client, though without any conscious consideration of fitness.  I'm trying out
new things[^0] after all.

From the [doc][go-net], we can figure out how to make a TCP connection.

```go
conn, err := net.Dial("tcp", "golang.org:80")
if err != nil {
	// handle error
}
fmt.Fprintf(conn, "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n")
status, err := bufio.NewReader(conn).ReadString('\n')
// ...
```

Let's copy that and replace with DICT command instead of HTTP:

```go
conn, err := net.Dial("tcp", "dict.org:2628")
if err != nil {
	panic(err)
}
defer conn.Close()
buf := bufio.NewReader(conn)
fmt.Fprintf(conn, "MATCH jargon word programming\n")
fmt.Fprintf(conn, "QUIT\n")

for {
	response, err := buf.ReadString('\n')
	if err != nil {
		// oftentimes this is EOF error
		fmt.Println(err)
		break
	}
	fmt.Printf(response)
}
```

Running this code, we get response:

```
220 dict.dict.org dictd 1.12.1/rf on Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 <auth.mime> <89266600.1914.1642341395@dict.dict.org>
152 4 matches found
jargon "cargo cult programming"
jargon "programming"
jargon "programming fluid"
jargon "voodoo programming"
.
250 ok [d/m/c = 0/4/3814; 0.000r 0.000u 0.000s]
221 bye [d/m/c = 0/0/0; 0.000r 0.000u 0.000s]
EOF
```

which is a good start.

There is a problem with this code: currently we are reading line by line,
rather than reading the whole response for each command.  We can't know if line
3 is response for the first command or the second this way.  A solution is to
check if the line is prefixed with a status code, but do we have a better
solution?

Let's wait till next week!

[go-net]: https://pkg.go.dev/net

[^0]: Not really, I've written a CLI client for Wiktionary API with Go before.